Neighbours of Brighton's rusting West Pier have called for it to be pulled down.
The Regency Square Area Society said the remains of the collapsed concert hall on the "sad old lady" should be cleared away immediately in the interest of safety.
It added that if the skeleton of the former pavilion at the seaward end could not be saved as a memorial within 12 months then it should be demolished.
It is the first clear sign that the tolerance of residents and businesses in the area for the continuing fight to save the structure might have been pushed to the limit.
The West Pier Trust, which owns the pier, should also be wound up, the society said.
Society chairman Roger Hinton said: "Many attempts have been made to put together a scheme to save Brighton's West Pier. It is now time to face reality. There is no pier to restore and no money to deal with."
Mr Hinton said the lower promenade around the pier was suffering and described the concert hall as "a mess".
He called for decking at the shore end to be cleared of temporary buildings and the lower promenade on either side of the pier to be brought up to the standard of nearby areas.
But the West Pier Trust has vowed to continue the fight to have the rusting iron structure restored.
Geoff Lockwood, chief executive of the trust, said: "I would have hoped they would have taken a broader public view. The West Pier site is part of the heritage of England and is crucial to the continuing regeneration of Brighton and Hove seafront."
Dr Lockwood insisted the pier was safe and said if any more of the structure collapsed it would fall into the sea to join the rest of the wreckage on the seabed.
Twenty warning notices have been put up to warn people against climbing on the pier and there are plans to install buoys along its length.
The trust and Brighton and Hove City Council have been in discussions with potential private sector partners about "specific ideas" for a new pier, combining a contemporary structure with surviving elements of the original.
Dr Lockwood said: "The trust is charged with using the pier for the public benefit and we believe a scheme that blends the heritage with a distinctive and distinguished-looking structure will continue the evolution of the site to that benefit."
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article