As a member of Sussex University's Foundation Year, I was appalled to read of the proposal to close its chemistry department.
The university first saw the light of day on Preston Park Road with 52 arts students but it was clearly understood that science departments would be established as soon as possible.
The guest speeches on Oration Day have often been given by world-famous scientists.
The abolition of the chemistry department would be a massive blow for all local sixth-formers anxious to obtain chemistry degrees without the extra expense of travel and accommodation away from home.
It would also undermine the university's reputation and bring the worth of its degrees into question.
It would frighten potential students everywhere: Why should anyone risk going on a course at Sussex if it might disappear in his or her second year?
The country needs more chemistry graduates, not fewer.
Courses in chemistry, physics, maths, biology, engineering etc should be ring-fenced and both tuition and living expenses paid to those on them.
All Sussex graduates - particularly those in the area - should oppose the projected abolition of the chemistry department.
-Margaret Brown(School of European Studies 1961-1965), Earley, Reading
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article