There's more than one site in Brighton and only one of them is Falmer. It is a beautiful village and it would be a shame to put a stadium there, apart from the fact the site is too small and has already been rejected.
The renewed enquiry was to see if any alternative sites were better. Why not wait for that result instead of bleating on about Falmer?
A better site would satisfy nearly everyone - I can't imagine most Albion fans care where a new stadium goes, as long as it is built somewhere.
I see the 1999 referendum has been brought up again. Remind me - were we invited to choose between several sites or was Falmer the only one mentioned?
If so, it's a bit like voting for free beer (I'd vote for that any time).
-Ed Bishop, Brighton
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article