It is Richard Halfpenny (Opinion, April 10) who should apologise - for his dangerously ignorant and simple-minded assertion that DNA evidence can show conclusive proof of a suspect's guilt.
The family of James Hanratty is continuing its fight to clear his name because DNA profiling is just as vulnerable to errors, such as cross-contamination, as any other forensic test. In this case, we are talking about samples taken from the remains of a body which has been dead for almost 40 years - considerable degeneration of the DNA could have occurred during that time.
-P D Jackson, Byron Street, Hove
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article