About five years ago, before I lived in Brighton, I was visiting my parents in the area and, while waiting at the bus stop opposite the Palace Pier, I noticed a young woman who was profoundly deaf.
Unfortunately, her speech was not clear. I believe she was asking directions and no one could assist her.
I felt so sad this girl was surrounded by people who could not give her the information she needed, I decided then I would learn sign language. I knew nothing about it and it took a further three years - until I was settled here - until I was able to do something.
I joined an evening class and obtained stage one British Sign Language (BSL).
I agree the Government should recognise BSL as a language (Argus, April 23) and would like to have gone on to stage two and then maybe stage three but it was too expensive.
I could not afford the several hundred pounds it would have cost. If we are to be encouraged to learn the language, why put it outside the reach of so many people?
I am sure if the cost were lowered or abolished, more people would learn.
When I did my course, it was over three terms and we were able to pay for each term as we went along.
The following year, the rules were changed and you had to pay up-front for the whole course. The course did not run that year because no one could afford it.
If both the deaf and hearing communities would like us to learn BSL, or any other sign language, make it affordable. It can only be to the benefit of all.
-Janette Sherry, Brighton
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article