Appeals such as "Give blood to save lives" (Argus May 8) always, if you'll pardon the pun, make my blood boil.
A few years ago, I queued up on a hot summer's day outside a Blood Donor Service van, a little apprehensive, but very much wanting to make my contribution for the first time.
After about 20 minutes, I was handed a card explaining what goes on. To my astonishment, there in black and white, it was stated that, as a gay man, my blood was not good enough. Statistically, of course, my blood is at a higher risk of being HIV-positive.
No consideration of the fact that I know I am HIV-negative, and that the few sexual encounters I have had have always been of the safest possible kind.
No, my blood was stereotyped, along with that of all other gay men, and branded worthless.
I refused to lie about my sexuality and therefore had to leave the queue and go home.
Despite all this, I would still gladly give blood. I find it sickening to think someone's life could be lost as a consequence of a shortage of donated blood, exacerbated by what appears to be a homophobic policy.
I assume the policy has not changed since I tried to give blood the first time but would love to learn differently.
-Name and address supplied
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article