The debate continues about whether or not we should publish letters from people who wish to express their views but not be identified.

E South, of Patcham, Brighton, says he noticed I referred last week to just two complaints about writers remaining anonymous, adding: "To my knowledge that is two more than complaints received saying there are not enough such letters published. Enough said!"

Well no, actually, because Graham Harold says, being invalid and almost totally housebound, he and his friends derive much pleasure from them, although it's by deriding the writers for being boring and remaining anonymous for no apparent reason - and lighting Graham's fire!

Mr and Mrs Turner, of Peacehaven, have been reading The Argus for more than 45 years (and have never written in) and say they enjoy readers' letters but believe it is "rare" to see a good reason for a name and address to be withheld.

Warren Morgan, of Brighton, says he has no problem with people withholding details if there is a genuine reason but fears those attacking the city council and the Government (both of the political shade he supports as letters page readers will know) may be fictitious.

Similarly, councillor and long-time reader Bob Carden, of Portslade, says he has got to know the distinctive style of many writers and suspects that some of the name and address supplied brigade are not from whom they claim to be.

It's true we do get hoax letters and have, on occasion, even printed some but we try hard not to be fooled, especially when they're from those requesting anonymity.

Still, I can feel a groundswell of opinion that we should print only those that do have a genuine reason for it. Before I finally decide, does anyone else care to comment?

Mr Morgan also points out I erred last week in describing David Neighbour as a Brighton and Hove councillor when, as a Falmer representative, he sits on Lewes District Council. Sorry.

Apologies, too, to Sean Avard, of estate agents Avard, who was not identified in a picture of him with pupils at Balfour School in Brighton planting trees published in Extra last Wednesday. His firm donated the trees.

We wrongly called Terry Boyle, one of the men involved in shares talks with Brighton and Hove Albion, Tony in a picture caption on Saturday. "I am Terence Michael Boyle, of Park Road, Coldean, Brighton," he tells me emphatically.

Sheila Wilkins, of Brighton, says we made her look silly when we changed her letter last Wednesday to say "many" instead of "none" of the diseases measles, mumps and German measles can be fatal. Sorry.

The web site address with the pond watcher story in last Tuesday's evolution was misprinted. The correct address is www.sussexponds.org.uk. Thanks to Liz Phillips for that one.

Rod Webb, of Horsham, says our report on Monday of the Australian cricket team's massive defeat of South Africa mentioned Shane Warne's impressive six wickets for 70 runs in 21 overs but not Glen McGrath, who "didn't do too badly either", notching up 8 for 49 in 26.3 overs.

A news in brief item in Tuesday's paper said there would be a Quadrophenia tour in Brighton this weekend.

In fact, it will be on Sunday, March 31 at 2pm. There is, however, a ghost walk tour tomorrow from 8pm. Both depart from the city hall. More information from tour guide Glenda Clark on 01273 888596.

And finally, Jo Pratt asks me to point out that the Rottingdean Club has not shut as some people thought after reading our bill poster in the village last Thursday.

It said "Rottingdean Club Closed" in reference to that day's story about the Rottingdean Good Fellowship Club, which is disbanding after 55 years.