Having returned from holiday, I checked with The Argus to find out the response by Ken Bodfish to my suggestion and questions published on this page on August 29.
I also sent a copy to Ken's office. Neither The Argus nor myself has had any response.
This makes a mockery of Ken's claim of openness.
I repeat my questions: What was the total sum last year paid to external agencies, advisers and research companies for consultation services and development concepts for the City?
Will he confirm that should the proposed "Tin Can" development of the King Alfred with Karis not go ahead, there will be no cost to taxpayers?
Will he give an indicative price for the sale or rental of the affordable housing within the proposed Karis King Alfred development?
-Denis Earl, Hove
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article