British Airways, Virgin Atlantic and bmi have joined forces with the TUC to call on the Government to approve a third runway at Heathrow.
The groups have launched a £100,000 advertising campaign warning that if the Government fails to give expansion at Heathrow the go-ahead then important economic benefits and thousands of jobs from the aviation industry will go to Europe.
Transport Secretary Alistair Darling is due to announce in the next few days whether the Government will back expanding Heathrow or building an additional runway at Stansted in Essex.
In a letter to be published in newspapers this week, the groups say creating a third runway at Heathrow would bring about £37 billion of benefits to the UK and create 24,000 direct jobs and 80,000 indirect jobs by 2030.
But they warn: "For Britain to be a global player in aviation we need to expand Heathrow. Otherwise business will go to Paris, Frankfurt and Amsterdam.
"While Stansted should be developed in the future, it will never be able to compete with Paris Charles de Gaulle, Frankfurt International or Amsterdam Schiphol airports."
The letter points out that while Heathrow has only two runways, Amsterdam Schiphol has five, Paris Charles de Gaulle has four and Frankfurt International has three.
It says: "If the right decision is not taken now, our aviation industry will be diminished, impacting not only London, but also the British economy.
"We are confident that the environmental challenges will be resolved so that a new runway can be built at Heathrow."
The letter is signed by BA's chief executive Rod Eddington, Virgin Atlantic's chairman Sir Richard Branson, bmi's chairman Sir Michael Bishop and Brendan Barber, general secretary of the TUC.
The airlines have previously said they have not ruled out taking legal action against the Government if it backs the expansion of Stansted over Heathrow.
They are concerned that the development would be cross-subsidised through higher landing charges being levied at Heathrow.
Monday December 08, 2003
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article