Your report (The Argus, June 10) said "even atheists" will be protected if the Government's incitement to religious hatred Bill becomes law.
As an atheist, I do not want my views protected by law. Neither do I expect them to be.
The real purpose of the bill is to placate extremist Muslims and add another privilege to those already enjoyed by Christians.
Unlike race, religion is a matter of personal choice. As such, it should be open to criticism, ridicule and satirical attack.
Religious hatred does not, as a rule, emanate from unbelievers and sceptics but from faith groups themselves. By believing theirs is the one true faith, it follows all others must be false.
This occurs even within religious denominations.
Those who are concerned about religious hatred should look to religion. It has poisoned social life in Northern Ireland and we have already seen book-burning and stone-throwing by religious mobs in Bradford and Birmingham.
The religious hatred bill threatens freedom of expression in speech, literature and the arts. It should be opposed by everyone, including religious followers, who value such freedom.
-W J McIlroy, Hove
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article