What a pity that instead of unbiased, fair reporting, the Argus gave us John Parry's inaccurate ranting about the Runnymede Report. Did he even read it, or just seize on paragraph 3.30 on page 38 of its 400 pages? Nowhere does it claim to be British is to be racist. "Racial" connotations are not "racist" connotations.
What about redressing the damage with a sober and factual account of what the report really does say? Then we might take the opportunity to debate its conclusions and 100-plus recommendations relevant to all of those living in Britain.
-Joan Anderson, The Avenue, Lewes
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article