Well you readers certainly are a sharp-eyed lot.
In our article last Wednesday about Susan Beresford joining the Argus as an artist in residence to mark both our 120th anniversary and the Year of the Artist we published pictures of some of her previous work.
Among the paintings was one of what we described in the accompanying caption as Brighton's Royal Pavilion - an easy mistake to make with a casual glance.
However, the picture was in fact of Sezincote, an equally impressive building in Moreton-in-Marsh in Gloucestershire, which is strikingly similar to our crown jewel.
R Wallace, of Brighton, complains that his letter published on October 12 asking questions about the decriminalisation of parking enforcement was edited so that it looked as he was referring to the Hove parking scheme when he wasn't.
Our apologies to Mr Wallace, who was happier when he asked the same questions at a subsequent Brighton and Hove Council meeting on which we reported.
For readers' information, Mr Wallace says the only figure quoted by Councillor John Ballance to support the council's view on the decriminalistaion of parking enforcement was 75 per cent of 700 people who responded in consultation.
He says that this response of less than one per cent of the electorate shows the council hasn't got the electorate's support to proceed and the figure was too low to give a meaningful result.
Our daily weather forecast in some editions of Monday's paper looked back rather than forward with a three-day outlook for "tomorrow, Sunday and Monday".
B Dyer, of Brighton, asks me to decipher. Of course. Unfortunately, a sub-editor accidentally picked up Friday's weather template panel and forgot to change the days.
I am sorry, but take some comfort from the fact that the belated prediction of somewhat poor weather over the weekend and a bit better on Monday was not too far off the mark. But then I guess it should have been!
"I realise, as one gets older, that the days seem to fly but I must be older than I thought," writes K G Stearman, of Brighton, in a letter accompanying a page from last Friday's Argus carrying a dateline of October 12, eight days before, and another from last Thursday, carrying a dateline of October 18, the day before.
"Sorry," says KG, "but I am a little confused."
Me too. I can only guess at what whoever came up with those dates was thinking of.
But back to KG, who concludes: "I hope my direct delivery account with the Argus for deliveries does not move so quickly. I may get next week's paper today - hopefully with all the results in it!"
Now there's an idea.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article