GCSE student Roland Foxcroft was delighted to discover he had achieved nine A*s.

But he was disappointed when he saw a photograph of himself with fellow star pupils of Brighton College in The Argus last Thursday and found he was not named in the caption.

His parents Georgie and Nigel Foxcroft emailed me to say: "I am sure you will understand this tarnished his enjoyment of what will have been probably the biggest day of his life."

Sorry, Roland.

Still on the subject of GCSEs and Edna Gorton, from Brighton, says she was disappointed to find we didn't publish this year's results at the same time as children received them.

The reason was we had to wait for schools to supply them to us. Thanks to those that did, a results table was published yesterday.

Our story two Fridays ago about Voluntary Service Overseas volunteer Amilee Rowe said she would be teaching English at a school in Eritrea in North East Africa - and working at the Hilton Hotel at the same time.

The VSO's Nikola Sandoval points out the organisation works with disadvantaged communities in poorer areas of developing countries so the hotel placement was unlikely!

The confusion was caused by the fact Amilee has been working at the Hilton Hotel in her home city of Brighton before travelling to Africa next month. Sorry to everyone.

Regular readers will remember our decision to begin printing all the next day's racing cards, even if it takes two pages, after being prompted by William Fraser, from Hailsham.

It was he who spotted we failed to follow the new rule on bank holiday Monday when we omitted that day's card for Huntingdon.

"The birthplace of Oliver Cromwell could not be hunted down," says Mr Fraser. "But don't worry, I wouldn't start a civil war over it!"

I should hope not - we managed to print the ten other cards, a tips story and the previous day's results across two pages and simply did not have enough room for the Huntingdon card.

And finally, John Bartlett spotted in the same paper a story about house prices that said they had "soured" by almost 200 per cent in the past seven.

Of course, this should have said "soared", although - as Mr Barlett says - perhaps we were right since rising prices had soured things for many people.

"If the lending agencies were not irresponsible in their lending policies, we may not be in this position (yet again)," he says. "If the loans weren't available, the properties wouldn't sell at those levels."