Our report of the Albion stadium public inquiry in some editions on Tuesday and Wednesday last week contained an error.

It wrongly stated Lewes District Council owned the land for the proposed adjacent coach park. The council does not support the stadium plan.

In fact, the site is owned by Brighton and Hove City Council, which does back the proposal, but it is in Lewes district.

My thanks to Ian Ross who says he didn't want us to unnecessarily alarm Seagulls' supporters.

In our report of the inquiry in last Wednesday's evening edition, we quoted club chief executive Martin Perry as saying their current home at Withdean would need to be rebuilt and the pitch turned through 390 degrees to make it viable.

The latter would, of course, be a geometrical impossibility, as Colin Hogarth, from Peacehaven, points out, adding: "Mr Perry appears to have no mathematical skills. Turning it 30 degrees the other way would be a much simpler task and so much cheaper."

The mistake was ours, not Mr Perry's. What he had actually said was 90 degrees. Sorry.

Jerome Abbo, from Brighton, says the "charming" print reproduced with the Your Memories column in Saturday's Weekend was not of the now-collapsed concert hall in the middle of the West Pier in Brighton but of what was once a theatre at the seaward end. Thank you.

Thanks, too, to Tony Booker who points out our story about the Bluebell railway steam weekend in some editions on Thursday last week referred to a locomotive built in 1857.

"We must be in a time warp," he says. "I wasn't aware the Rocket or one of his siblings actually puffed up and down the Brighton line! It obviously should have said 1957 and, probably, a class 9F loco."

Former Hove councillor Bob Bailey, whom we reported on Monday was planning to make a return to the political fray, says we wrongly stated that he would be up against three Labour councillors in Goldsmid, including Betty Walshe.

In fact, Councillor Walshe is standing down in May and final nominations do not close until April. Sorry.

Our story in Monday's evening edition about Brighton and Hove City Council advertising for a new £45,000+ head of tourism was misleading.

It unfairly compared the role to the tourism officer for North Cornwall District Council, who earns about £22,000, and said his responsibility included Newquay.

In fact, Newquay is covered by Restormel Borough Council, whose head of tourism earns a sum approaching the Brighton advertised job but whose responsibilities are not so great. My thanks for the clarification to city council Press officer Alan Stone.

Now to this week's Spicer (courtesy, of course, of Gerald, from Portslade) who refers to the misspelling of Islingword Road, Brighton, in the article on February 14, about a threat to close the sub-post office there. We spelt it Islingwood.

He also points out the Emmaus charity is in Drove Road, Portslade, and not Dore Road as we stated in a picture story on Monday.

And finally, Mrs J Heath, from Brighton, asks if it is possible to have a plural of yeast - ie yeasts - as appeared in the solution to the numberwords puzzle of Saturday, February 15.

"I envisage it as a singular item," she says. "Please enlighten me."

Well, I'll try. According to my dictionary (the New Oxford English), yeast is a mass noun that is not ordinarily used in the plural (other examples are bacon and banking) but may be with the sense "different types of yeasts."

So, in answer to your question, Mrs Heath, yes it is - and thanks for enlightening me too!