Blame for this year's 16.4 per cent increase in Brighton and Hove's council tax bills was today laid at the Government's door.
The Audit Commission defied ministers by giving official confirmation cash had been switched from the South-East to Labour heartlands in the north.
As a result, Brighton and Hove got a Government grant increase of only 3.5 per cent.
City council deputy leader Sue John said: "Clearly we are not that happy with the settlement, it has been a very difficult year for us and we do feel the formula needs to be changed in some way."
East Sussex County Council received an increase of 3.8 per cent and West Sussex County Council four per cent - well below the national average of 5.9 per cent.
East Sussex County Council leader Peter Jones said: "I am delighted the detailed work undertaken by the Audit Commission confirms many of the views taken by local government leaders last year about why council tax had gone up by so much."
The situation was made worse by "unusual" spending demands from Government for extra National Insurance and pension payments and cash for schools, according to a report by the independent financial watchdog.
Councils in Sussex had been left with a stark choice - to cut services or increase council tax bills.
Brighton and Hove City Council opted to bridge the gap with a 16.4 per cent increase in bills, including the police precept - £151.25 for an average band D home.
The report, a study of why the average council tax rise was so high in 2003/4, said: "We found a clear association between the size of grant increase a council received and its increase in council tax. The greater the increase in grant, the less was the increase in council tax."
Local government minister Nick Raynsford had flatly denied any link between the size of grants and the bill sent to householders or cash had been redirected from councils in the South-East to Labour's strongholds.
Local authorities face another tough year in 2004/5 after Brighton and Hove got a grant increase of only 3.6 per cent. East and West Sussex got 4.5 per cent each.
Thursday December 04, 2003
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article