With the continuing debate on financing universities through top-up fees there is one thing that needs explaining - perhaps someone can help?

The Government has declared its aim is for 50 per cent of school-leavers to attend a university.

If this target is reached some time in the future, 50 per cent of the adult population will have graduated and have degrees.

Where are the jobs for these people and will the qualifications match the national need? We know doctors are in short supply and there will be a need for engineers, scientists, teachers and the like to ensure the country will flourish.

But are we in danger of having a surplus to requirements of experts in media studies and anthropology, and budding Damian Hirsts to name a few?

As a taxpayer I accept I should help to provide for the education of our young people as an investment for the future but I need to know the money is well spent.

I also want to see that the other 50 per cent of school leavers are well provided for so there are adequate numbers of skilled tradesmen/women and technicians.

Somehow the balance doesn't seem right. There is more to debate than just finance.

-Brian Beck, Lewes