A child was admitted to hospital after a convenience store allegedly sold her and her friend three bottles of vodka.
On Tuesday, a Hastings Borough Council licensing panel held a hearing to review the premises licence of a convenience store at 7-8 Harold Place.
The hearing had been called in response to an application from East Sussex Trading Standards, which alleged the store has been involved in the sale of alcohol to those under the age of 18.
In their application, trading standards officers said two 14-year-old girls had allegedly been able to purchase three bottles of vodka from the store on the November 4. One of these girls later became ill and was admitted to hospital, the application said.
Trading standards officers said they visited the store to investigate later the same month, but CCTV footage from the day of the alleged sales had expired by the time of the visit.
Councillors also heard how trading standards officers had conducted a ‘test sale’ by an underage volunteer in April. Officers said this volunteer, aged 14, was sold a can of lager by a woman who was not an employee of the store and had not been authorised to sell alcohol.
The trading standards application was supported by a statement from East Sussex County Council’s public health department, which called on the council to consider revoking the store’s licence or placing ‘strong restrictions’ on it.
The calls to revoke the licence were not shared by trading standards, however. Speaking at the hearing, Paul Davison, East Sussex Trading Standards’ enforcement and investigations manager, suggested stronger conditions may be ‘the best way forward’.
Mr Davison said: “I appreciate the sanctions which could be applied and that they do include revocation. But I am also mindful of the heavy footfall… [and] the location of the store and for that reason I believe an adjustment to the licence conditions is the best way forward… rather than revocation.
“I work closely with public health, I’ve seen their report and everything in it I agree with. But I just think that perhaps a tighter ship at the premises is the best way forward at this time.”
To this end, Mr Davison drew the panel’s attention to a number of conditions suggested as part of his organisation’s application. These included: stricter CCTV controls, including a requirement for footage to be kept for a minimum of 31 days; the operation of a Challenge 25 policy on restricted sales and a requirement for a personal licence holder to be on the premises at all times.
Hirji Shivji Hirani, the store’s owner, indicated that he would be willing to accept these conditions, saying he would follow whatever decision the panel reached.
Following discussion, the panel opted to add two further conditions. These were restrictions preventing the store from selling spirits in bottles smaller than 75cl or any beers or ciders stronger than 6.5 per cent ABV.
The panel also imposed a six-week suspension of the store’s licence, which councillors said was intended to give the business time to make the necessary changes.
The suspension will come into force 21 days from the date of the hearing, allowing the store time to make an appeal. The store will be able to remain open during any suspension, but will not be able to sell alcohol.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel