A former subpostmistress who was convicted of fraud based on evidence from the Post Office’s faulty Horizon IT system has had her conviction quashed by the Court of Appeal.

Kathleen Crane was handed a 12-month community order and ordered to repay more than £18,000 in 2010 after she was accused of taking money from her Post Office branch in Eastbourne.

She was one of hundreds of postmasters who were convicted after the Post Office’s defective Horizon accounting system produced figures which suggested money was missing at their branches.

At a hearing in London on Thursday, three appeal judges ruled there was “no doubt” Mrs Crane’s conviction was unsafe, adding that she was “kept in ignorance” over Horizon’s defects.

Lord Justice Holroyde said: “We have no doubt that her prosecution was an abuse of process.

“Nor do we have any doubt that her conviction is unsafe.”

The 68-year-old attended Thursday’s hearing and wept when her conviction was quashed.

She was wore her late husband’s scarf to the hearing.

The Argus: Former subpostmistress Kathleen Crane outside the Royal Courts of Justice in London, with her daughters, Lucy (left) and Katy, Former subpostmistress Kathleen Crane outside the Royal Courts of Justice in London, with her daughters, Lucy (left) and Katy, (Image: PA)

Speaking to ITV outside the Royal Courts of Justice following the decision, the mother-of-two said her “horrible” experience was now over and urged others affected by the scandal to come forward, saying: “If you’re innocent, you should have your conviction quashed.”

Her daughter, Katy Crane, who joined her mother in court alongside her sister Lucy Crane, said: “I actually don’t know how they (the Post Office) sleep at night.

“I absolutely think someone should serve some jail time. I think somebody needs to be held to account.”

Mrs Crane’s case is the first of many expected to reach the Court of Appeal as a result of the Post Office’s own case review, with the company contacting her last June to say it believed there had been a miscarriage of justice.

With the support of daughter, Katy, Mrs Crane lodged an appeal on January 10 this year, which the Post Office did not resist.

MOST READ:

​To have access to all of our best stories subscribe to The Argus here

Flora Page, representing her in court, said Mrs Crane had “suffered in silence” since her “appalling experience”, adding that a “fraud she had not committed brought its own humiliation”.

She said: “She is somewhat overcome with the prospect of clearing her name.

“She works in a care home and she will no longer have to contend, we hope, with the fact that this conviction comes up every year when they do their enhanced checks.

“It will close a very long and painful chapter in Mrs Crane’s blameless life.”

The Argus: Former subpostmistress Kathleen Crane speaks to the media outside the Royal Courts of Justice in LondonFormer subpostmistress Kathleen Crane speaks to the media outside the Royal Courts of Justice in London (Image: PA)

Mrs Crane’s husband, Robert, became subpostmaster of the Old Town Post Office in Eastbourne in October 2000.

Mrs Crane took over the running of the branch due to his ill health. Mr Crane died in 2016.

An audit in January 2010 found a financial shortfall but after voluntarily attending an interview with Post Office investigators Mrs Crane was accused of defrauding the company of £18,721.52.

During the investigation, she said she had been aware of inexplicable shortfalls since 2008 and asked for them to be investigated, but no action was taken.

She later pleaded guilty to fraud by false representation after legal advice made her feel the Horizon system was infallible.

On top of her sentence, she was ordered by a judge at Lewes Crown Court in July 2010 to pay £1,550 in costs and complete 200 hours of unpaid work.

The Court of Appeal heard Mrs Crane maintained that she and her husband were “at a loss” to explain the shortfall.

Simon Baker KC, representing the Post Office on Thursday, said while the company was duty-bound to investigate based on evidence available at the time, the case “amounts to an abuse of process”.

He also told the court that three appeals against convictions arising from the scandal had been lodged in the last week.

Lord Justice Holroyde, sitting with Mr Justice Picken and Mrs Justice Farbey, said: “No leap of imagination is needed to understand the anxiety and fear which Mrs Crane and her late husband, who is since sadly deceased, and their two daughters must have experienced.

“We are satisfied that the respondent’s (the Post Office) concession is right and properly made.

“This is indeed a Horizon case in which the reliability of the Horizon data was essential for the prosecution.

The Argus: Former subpostmistress Kathleen Crane gestures as she leaves the Royal Courts of Justice in London, with her daughters, Lucy (left) and KatyFormer subpostmistress Kathleen Crane gestures as she leaves the Royal Courts of Justice in London, with her daughters, Lucy (left) and Katy (Image: PA)

“No relevant investigation was carried out and no disclosure was made of the known concerns about Horizon.

“She (Mrs Crane) pleaded guilty because she and those representing her had been kept in ignorance.”

Alongside the hundreds convicted in court, the Post Office also forced at least 4,000 branch managers to pay back cash based on the flawed Horizon data.

Some victims, whose plight was highlighted by the recent ITV drama Mr Bates Vs The Post Office, were left financially ruined and shunned by their communities, while others took their own lives.

In the wake of the scandal, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak announced the government intended to introduce blanket legislation to exonerate those wrongly prosecuted in England and Wales.