I am grateful to Peter James, who chaired the Independent Drugs Commission for Brighton and Hove, for his Saturday Soapbox (The Argus, May 17) in which he said that the commission found much to applaud, including “Brighton Housing Trust’s hugely effective residential abstinence programme”.
Unfortunately the final report of the commission didn’t recognise this at all.
Nowhere in the report, not once, is there any reference to “abstinence”, a staggering omission given it is current Government policy to champion abstinence.
Nowhere, not once, is there any reference to residential rehabilitation, the form of treatment that evidence shows as being the most effective.
Apart from the recommendation not to proceed with consumption rooms, the report is as disappointing as the previous two reports by the commission.
The work of the commission has taken up very many hours of council officer time and that of people working for the NHS and other organisations. I wonder if anyone has calculated the cost of this.
Given the report has come up with nothing that wasn’t known at the outset, the whole process has been a waste of public money and a distraction from a proper debate.
Andy Winter, chief executive of Brighton Housing Trust
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here